The Conservative Independent ARTICLES
Home  |  Archives  |  Contact  |  Copyright notice
         
 

Past and Future: Safely Away From Us - Maybe Not

By Allen J Duffis
Published: January 13, 2009

 
   Article tools
e-mail
printer friendly version
reprints & permissions
Subscription Center
 
    Untitled Document

It has always been cautioned that we should keep dangerous items, like guns and knives away from children. In that light, the same could be said for control of the Past and the Future. The past as history as well as the history that is yet to come should also be kept safely away from children: adult children that is - like us. Can you imagine the damage the human race could do with any capability to effectively control the Future? Well I can and even from the restricted vantage of imaginative political projection the prospect is scary.

The sin of tampering with both the past and the future that may be falls equally upon Liberals and Conservatives alike. Each group through recorded history has expressed a desire to dictate how our past is recorded, to in turn affect policies of the present and, thereupon, affect what our future will be. It is, however, the motives of the Liberals that we should fear most at this point in our nation's history, and the reason why is simple to equate.

On average, Hard Core Conservatives have never been able to come up out of the past long enough to see a future. Their idea of the future is a continuation of the present as a reflection of the past; an outlook they view from the rim of a flawed moralistic hole they have dug in the present as a frontline against change. That's why, on average, they distrust science, most scientists don't like and, for the most part, can't write Science Fiction.

Hard Core Liberals on the other hand do not do well with the genre either. For real Science Fiction is, in reality, projected Future Science based upon present day reality; the one Liberals in general tend to reject. Unfortunately for Liberals, analytical science has a nasty tendency to reflect reality for what it is - real.

To get around that sticking point, Liberals have a long and dedicated history of resorting to the renaming of what they don't like. And should that approach not work, to the expansion of its domain to encompass what they'd like it to be.

The Homosexuality Debate

It has long been established that there are only two sexes in this world. Taking into consideration the biological existence of mammalian living creatures, and with specificity to the human species, that would indicate - Male and Female. That means on this planet, Earth, there simply is - no third sex.

This long-time recognition does not satisfy the Liberal element, which would like to make room for a politically vocal third - Homosexuals. So they are now in the process of expanding the known and established science of biology - to include homosexual, and hopefully to establish within the letter of the law the concept of, 'two like sexes' constituting - a Third Sex.

In the bargain, the supporters of this preposterous idea would also like to eliminate with one fell legislative swoop the social and scientific concept of - Normal.

So let us go through some of the very real possibilities as to where this policy can take American society; always keeping in mind that you, your children and their children are being coerced into riding on this spaceship to scientific implausibility.

A Future World Short Story

Sometime in the year 20xx, your son will go out for the evening to a local bar for a social drink. During this time he will meet an attractive young lady, Dorothy, with whom he will strike up a conversation and be immediately drawn sexually to. At the end of the evening, the conversation leads them to her room in a nearby hotel, where they sexually consummate the relationship. The couple will date for several weeks, he will introduce her to his family, and she to hers.

The romance will lead to matrimony at the local justice of the peace, whereupon, after the honeymoon he will purchase an abode for them to set up house, and prepare for the eventual arrival of children. Sounds - NORMAL - so far - doesn't it?

After a year, however, when there are no children forthcoming, and the new bride refuses comes forth with a bombshell. It would seem that Dorothy was born a Dan, but had a sex change operation several years prior to their meeting.

Your traumatized beyond belief son will immediately eject his 'wife' from their home. The very next day he will consult with a lawyer to dissolve the union, which in his eyes was fraudulent. From this point your son's life will change forever; for you see, if the Neo-Liberals have their way - he will have no legal leg to stand upon, and no - NORMAL - rights to speak of in the divorce court.

Under a Neo-Liberal Court and amended past laws, or newly written Neo-Liberal Laws, the following is a possible nightmare scenario of what he may have to face:

(1) That his new bride did not tell him that 'She' was once a 'He' will not make him eligible for an annulment. Under this new court, a person's sexual orientation will be considered a private matter and not subject to 'legally compelled public revelation or pledge' at the time of meeting. In other words, such would be considered as a violation of 'her' - 'Right to Privacy.'

Therefore, what will have been in effect was the legality of a 'face value' assignment at the time they met; meaning the 'lady' was under no legal obligation to reveal to you son that she was not born a - natural woman. Why you ask? Because the laws will have been amended to legally assign to her the new sex she'd surgically opted for. This will lead to the next part of your son's living nightmare.

(2) Under the new laws, the sex change will have entitled her to be 'legally' deemed her a 'legitimate woman' in the eyes of the law, and - Natural be damned. This legal assignment will entitle her to all aspects of the marital contract, which will be inclusive of - half of everything your son owns: house, car, savings, eventual inheritance and - alimony. And if the court so opted, that alimony could be, if 'she' chooses not to marry again - for life.

(3) Depending on how the case proceeds and ends, your son may also be held fully responsible for her legal bills.

So what will he be able to do for himself from a legal standpoint? Well under the circumstances as related - very little. He can as a free American check out of the marriage - within the restrictions of the new law - at anytime he wants, but in reality he can never leave it completely. Let's face it, if there were no 'testicles dangling' at the time he and his biologically counterfeit partner met, in the vernacular of the street - he's screwed!

"Welcome to the Hotel California."

A Frightening Brave New World Scenario

Our new president, Barack Obama, is on record as being for the rights of all Americans, regardless of sexual preference. And as he openly orchestrates the formation of his administration, it would appear that he is sticking to that pledge. Therefore, the question that hangs over America's moral future as we used to know it is - how far will he go and most of all, how far will those Neo Liberals in the Democratic Party push him to go?

Like it or not, he has to know that he owes them big-time and they will do all they can to collect. So what is it they want? A possible clue to that nagging question, and a possible first warning shot of what is to come, may possibly be found in the following announcement from the Associated Press:



Gay NH bishop to offer prayer at inaugural event

Monday 12 January 2009

The Associated Press (AP)

Concord, New Hampshire - The first openly gay Episcopal bishop will offer a prayer at the Lincoln Memorial at an inaugural event for President-elect Barack Obama.

New Hampshire Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson Robinson, 61, said both Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will attend the event, and Obama is expected to speak. As for himself, Robinson said he doesn't yet know what he'll say, but he knows - he won't use a Bible.

"While that is a holy and sacred text to me, it is not for many Americans," Robinson said. "I will be careful not to be especially Christian in my prayer. This is a prayer for the whole nation."

Those who have read my editorials these last few years know that I am Agnostic, which means that I take no firm stance for or against the existence of a Supreme Being. That stance is a product of my scientific background. But that same logic compels me to question how the representative of a religious heritage based upon Judeo Christian ethics, can possibly conduct a religiously oriented oath of office - without the employment of a Holy Bible?

The equivalent would be my college chemistry professor conducting a seminar without the Periodic Table of Elements. I say it can't be done - unless the ceremony being performed is to be representative of some new philosophical order. And even as an Agnostic, I view that possibility with grave alarm. Is this part of the - CHANGE - the new Obama administration has been touting?

Also, one is naturally moved to inquire - which segment of the nation the Rev. Robinson is speaking of as the 'whole nation' - the Normal or the Abnormal?(Click HERE to read full story)

.....................................................................................

California Senate Votes to Mandate Public Schools to Include Homosexuality, Transsexuality, Bisexuality Education

SACRAMENTO, Calif., The Christian Newswire - May 11, 2008 -- The California State Senate today passed SB 1437 which seeks to indoctrinate innocent children caught in the tug-of-war between traditional families and the outrageous homosexual agenda.”

SB 1437 requires textbooks to highlight the so- called positive contributions of homosexual and transgender individuals to society and would prevent textbooks, teaching materials, instruction, and “school- sponsored activities” from reflecting adversely upon persons based on their sexual orientation or actual or perceived gender.

It is important to note that these people have an agenda. They not only want a 'firm irreversible foot in the door of Normalcy', they want to rip it from its very hinges forever! And standing in line behind them are the new politically empowered groups from that other world: Transvestites, Pedophiles, NAMBLA (North American Man/ Boy Love Association) and who knows what else to be released from Pandora's Box.(Click HERE for NAMBLA website)

Of course, those of you with insight born of a knowledge of the past instinctively know that many other laws will have to - Change - to accommodate this - New Social Change.

In time, under political pressure from these groups and their Liberal advocates, pre school, elementary and high school curriculums and text books, will have to be - Radically Revised - radically to render their lifestyles as - inclusive. Once that change is in place for a generation or so, the Neo Liberal Left will have achieved the long sought prize of - Normal Modification. And at this point - you, the present lifestyle icon of - Normal - will be regarded as -Equal - to them and their flock in all aspects of social life.

That's right, they will now be in the room with you and your children, and there will be no door of 'historically established morality' to lock them out.

Out of the Frying Pan and Into the Fire

Should anything approaching the above described ever evolve, in essence it will indicate that we, as a nation and people, will have escaped from the Neo-Right's attempt at an 'Anti Constitutional Imperial Presidency', only to have stumbled into a more encompassing socially and morally corrosive 'Coffee House Presidency' - wielded by the iron hand of the Neo Left.

As I stated previously, "Welcome to the Hotel California."

 

 

Your comments - The voices of our readers
       
  © Copyright 2005-2009 Allen J. Duffis.All rights reserved.